Introduction

Can We Help with Your Assignment?

Let us do your homework! Professional writers in all subject areas are available and will meet your assignment deadline. Free proofreading and copy-editing included.

This study focused on an object in motion with a uniform acceleration.  Using the Motion Encoder System and LoggerPro, the position, velocity, and time were taken and analyzed with the goal to determine linear and quadratic acceleration.  Interpreting the graphs allowed discovery of the affect of acceleration due to Earth’s gravity.  This was represented by the value of the average acceleration of 9.8m/s^2 when sine of theta was equal to 1 (90 degrees).

The significance of this experiment was to represent how acceleration changes in relationship to an incline’s angle to determine freefall acceleration.  With Galileo’s restricted method to determine acceleration with inclined planes, the data collected from the trials with the inclined planes was used to determine freefall experiment using a graph of the collected average acceleration versus sine of theta.  It was hypothesized that the acceleration would be directly proportional to the angle of the incline and that the acceleration would approach 9.8m/s^2 as the angle of the incline approached 90 degrees.

Method

"Be Bold" No-Essay \$10,000 Scholarship

The \$10,000 “Be Bold” Scholarship is a no-essay scholarship that will be awarded to the applicant with the boldest profile. To us, boldest does not mean “best”, or “most accomplished”. Being bold means being: Earnest, Determined, Moving. The scholarship will be awarded to the student whose profile is most bold, according to these characteristics.

Using a Lab Quest and Motion Encoder System, a cart was pushed up at various angles (increased amount of stacked books) on a dynamics track.  A position versus time and velocity versus time graph was plotted on the computer using LoggerPro for all three trials for each angle of incline.  Using linear fit on the velocity versus time graph and a quadratic fit on the position versus time graph, the linear acceleration and quadratic acceleration, respectively, were collected for each trial.  An average linear acceleration and average quadratic acceleration were calculated at the end of trials execution.

Data

Number of riser blocks Height

h (m)

Length of incline, x (m) Sin(theta)
 Acceleration

Trial 1 (m/s^2)

Trial 2

(m/s^2)

Trial 3

(m/s^2)

Average acceleration (linear, L)

(m/s^2)

1.21 0.003 0.005 0.007 0.005
1 0.007 1.21 0.006 L0.062

Q0.062

0.058

0.058

0.059

0.058

0.06 0.06
2 0.019 1.21 0.016 L0.146

Q0.146

0.143

0.144

0.143

0.144

0.144 0.144
3 0.028 1.21 0.023 L0.212

Q0.212

0.212

0.212

0.217

0.216

0.214 0.214
4 0.037 1.21 0.031 L0.286

Q0.290

0.294

0.294

0.294

0.294

0.291 0.292
5 0.05 1.21 0.041 L0.392

Q0.394

0.393

0.394

0.394

0.390

0.393 0.392

Analysis

The value of the acceleration when sin(theta) equals 1(freefall) is about 9.57 which is relatively close to the value of 9.8 which is the value of freefall acceleration.  The percent error for this experimental value of freefall acceleration versus the actual is represented below. Conclusion

Acceleration is directly related to the angle of an incline.  When an angle is 90 degrees, the object is in freefall and acceleration is equal to the acceleration due to the Earth’s gravity, 9.8m/s^2.  Reasons for the mild percent error are issues of rounding numbers and slight inaccurate selection of graph segments when collecting data for linear and quadratic acceleration. 